I'll monitor the situation and make sure John's concern doesn't happen.

----- Original Message -----
From: John Murphy <john.murphy@manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 5:12 am
Subject: Re: roffey discussion
To: Hector MacQueen <hector.macqueen@ed.ac.uk>
Cc: obligations@uwo.ca

> I shd have said what I meant more clearly.  What I am
> against is the  
> kind of phishing that the student that prompted the present
> discussion  
> attempted.  That said, I guess you have better students
> than me,  
> Hector.  Mine don't seem to have time have time to reflect
> at length  
> (or at least don't perceive themselves as having such
> time).  For  
> them, under a semesterized system, contract law is a blur: it's
> all  
> "wham, bam here's the exam".  And all tehy ever ask, or
> seem to ask,  
> is (in various degrees of disguise) "what's the answer to
> this  
> question?" or "what's on the exam this year?".
> 
> JM
> 
> 
> 

--
Jason Neyers
Associate Professor of Law & 
Cassels Brock LLP Faculty Fellow in Contract Law
Faculty of Law
University of Western Ontario
N6A 3K7
(519) 661-2111 x. 88435